To alienate human beings from their own decision-making is to change them into objects.”
― Paulo Freire
“The
oppressors do not favor promoting the community as a whole, but rather selected
leaders.” Paul Freire in his book
"Pedagogy of the Oppressed" writes about a long existing power
struggle in the education system as we know it today. In this power struggle
teachers withhold from getting to know their students on a deeper level. Educators
believe they are the main and only source of power and knowledge in the
classroom. Teachers attempt to maintain a professional relationship with their
students in order to establish and hold on to their perceived sense of power.
Often, teachers believe they know what is best for the child. Throughout my
very short time learning the history and current condition of education I
realized the only thing missing was and is the voice of the child. Admittedly,
The power the teacher upholds at time is not asserted purposely but
subconsciously. With comments like the ones the teachers in Kittle's chapter
nine express so nonchalantly, power is assumed and the learning is exhibited on
the child rather than discussed with the child. The teacher as
the giver and student as receiver is where Freire's theory of Banking Education
comes to play in the classroom. Teachers believe students are blank and empty
vessels waiting and wanting to be filled by their teacher's knowledge. This is
obviously wrong because students have their own lives outside of the 8 hours
they are in school. When Kittle's colleague says "well of course if
you let them just write about themselves they will. That’s easy. Literary
criticism: that's hard." This colleague presents the idea that what she
knows how to do is better than what the students know how to do and in order
for them to be successful they must forget self and focus on what the school
considers valuable. With low graduation rates and high drops out rates and a
number of students claiming "school is not for me", I do not think
this way of educating students is working so well.
I respect Kittle for a number of reasons. She puts the needs of her students first. She sits and asks herself what can make education more relateable and enjoyable for these students. I like to believe leaders are actually the best servants. When asked to lead a group of people I find that learning is more effective when the knowledge is flowing from both directions. Kittle remembers a time with her husband where she completely blanks out at the hardware due to her lack of interest in tools; she understands why her students may blank out during a lesson forcibly given to them on a topic they do not enjoy. Kittle in her school's circular deeply think about ways they can enrich their readers and writer. Her collage Jason shared a piece with the class on his own analysis of The Scarlet Letter including some introspect to his personal life, because of his sharing and model analysis Jason is building a community in his classroom: a community of self assessment, openness and trust. This type of environment help students who may be used to the overbearing ad restricted emotions that come with academic writing. As Jason and Kittle have done, teachers should make the exchange with their students an equal one.
In chapter 10 Kittle speaks about multi-genre projects. I have never done one throughout my education and the thought of administering one to a group of 30 students gave me a bit of anxiety. What I adore about Kittle is she does not harbor any secrets. And what she does for herself, she does for her students. There is no separation in approach or behavior. Kittle admits she is no expert at blending genres but she knows Don Murray is and so she will follow closely behind his works to gain a deeper understanding. In her write along them class, Kittle is an advocate for mentor text, she not only advocates for them in her classroom but she uses mentor texts in her personal and professional life. To admit one does not know something is to create a pathway to new information, new knowledge and new wisdom. But to act as though one is an expert in it all is to close all doors and gates to true knowledge. The doors are always open in Kittle's classroom.
In relation to circular planning Chapter 14 of
Milner and Milner: “Planning Lessons” helps new teachers and even veteran
teachers who feel as though they are stuck in the question of how do I plan?
This question hits home for me. Even today, though I now understand the
components of a lesson plan and what to include in one, I find myself asking
questions such as “do I write the lesson plan a night before based on my
student’s comprehension of the work from the previous lesson or are my weekly lesson
plans written during the weekend? How do I pick a unit to write about and when
do I create unit plans, in the summer? Planning, though slowly making more
sense to me is still a relevant question I struggle with. For students who have not yet
created a lesson plan the advice given to Milner is perfect, “write down all
of your ideas…just get it all down on paper….take one of those ideas write as
much as you possibly can on that concept. Each sheet of paper represents one
lesson”. I was completely taken away by the simplicity of how to write a lesson
and wish I had learned it this way before I was given the templates to fill
out. Lesson plans are only a delivery system of the ideas that one has in their head! There is no need to complicate a lesson plan, a lesson plans only exist to make sure teachers do not stand in the front of the classrooms singing songs of "umms and what else did I want to say?"
Where I see Milner and Kittle agree with Freire is in their belief that the student is also involved in the lesson planning. Teachers cannot expect to teach what they what and how they want to a room full of different learners and expect to effective. Milner reminds teachers that lesson planning is a “balance awareness of personal needs of your students and circular guides and textbook resources.” Though some teachers are given lesson plan guides, delivery and execution is in the hands of the teacher. During my grad school experience one of my professors allowed the last 6 weeks of school to be decided by students and to be taught by students! The last 6 weeks o f school was student picked and student led while the first weeks of school were picked by her and monitored by her. If teachers can find this balance in creating their circular then all parties will benefit. Though this chapter along with Burke's Composing a Curriculum was quite informative and helpful including timing tips, flexibility and instructional design, even Milner expresses that lesson planning includes homework, paper load for the teacher, routines and classroom management. So though I do think reading about it helps, there is nothing that can prepare a teacher for those aspects other than being in front of your students.